Led by
1 link
Graph · Campaign
01 · In focus
The structured facts the source records about Encode Justice's co-sponsorship of California SB 1047, the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act (February–September 2024), the count of declared adjacencies in the corpus, and the federation map zoomed on this node and its neighbours.
campaign
↑6 declared connections
02 · Connections
Split by direction. Direct links are the ones Encode Justice's co-sponsorship of California SB 1047, the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act (February–September 2024)’s source record names; inferred backlinks are records elsewhere in the corpus that point at this entity.
4 links
Links named in this entity's structured fields.
1 link
1 link
2 links
2 links
Other records that name this entity.
03 · Background
Body prose as it appears in movement-graph’s published markdown for this entity. Links to other corpus entities resolve to their graph page; links to deeper repo paths are kept as text so the page does not invent a route.
From February through September 2024, Encode Justice — the youth-led international AI-policy advocacy organisation founded by Sneha Revanur — co-sponsored California Senate Bill 1047, the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act, authored by State Senator Scott Wiener. The bill, the first substantive US-state legislative attempt at frontier-AI safety regulation, was sponsored by Encode Justice alongside the Center for AI Safety Action Fund and Economic Security Action California, and was co-authored by Senator Roth (D-Riverside), Senator Susan Rubio (D-Baldwin Park), and Senator Stern (D-Los Angeles). Encode's working theory of change was that a youth-led civil-society coalition could combine three tracks — direct bill sponsorship and Sacramento lobbying, a public-mobilization track running op-eds and an entertainment-industry open letter, and validator endorsements from senior AI researchers — to push the bill through both chambers of the California legislature and onto the governor's desk. The campaign succeeded in producing the largest civil-society coalition any US-state frontier-AI safety bill had assembled to date, and lost the bill to Governor Gavin Newsom's 29 September 2024 veto.
SB 1047 was introduced on 7 February 2024 with Encode Justice publicly named as a co-sponsor from the outset. As filed, the bill applied to so-called "covered models" — frontier AI systems trained using more than 10^26 floating-point operations and costing more than $100 million to train — and required their developers to conduct pre-deployment safety testing and red-teaming, implement cybersecurity safeguards and a full-shutdown capability, publish annual safety and security protocols, accept civil liability for severe harms enforceable by the California Attorney General, and provide whistleblower protections for laboratory employees. The bill also established CalCompute, a public computing cluster intended to give academic and startup researchers access to frontier-scale infrastructure outside the major labs. Encode Justice's policy framing treated SB 1047 as the first chance to make the basic safety practices that the largest AI developers had already publicly committed to a matter of enforceable state law rather than voluntary corporate policy.
On 21 May 2024 the California Senate passed SB 1047 by a bipartisan 32–1 vote. Encode VP of Political Affairs Sunny Gandhi — who served as Encode's lead on the Sacramento track throughout the campaign — framed the Senate vote in the Wiener office's accompanying press release with the statement that "this legislation will help bring us closer to ensuring AI is developed responsibly, with the necessary guardrails to protect our generation's future." The same press release organised the campaign's validator track around the two most highly cited AI researchers on the public record — Geoffrey Hinton, the former Google AI lead, and Yoshua Bengio, the Mila and Université de Montréal computer scientist — both of whom endorsed the bill publicly. Hinton's quoted line that "SB 1047 takes a very sensible approach to balance those concerns" of AI risks and that "it's critical that we have legislation with real teeth to address the risks" became one of the campaign's most cited validator endorsements through summer 2024. Bengio published a supporting op-ed in Fortune and joined the Hinton endorsement in subsequent campaign materials.
Through summer 2024 the bill drew increasingly intense opposition from major Silicon Valley developers — Google, Meta, OpenAI, Andreessen Horowitz, and Y Combinator — and from a portion of the Congressional Democratic delegation including Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi and House Science Committee Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren. On 15 August 2024, Wiener filed substantial amendments responding to industry feedback: the originally proposed Frontier Model Division was removed, pre-harm enforcement was narrowed, criminal perjury penalties were dropped, and a "reasonable care" standard was substituted for the original draft's "reasonable assurance." Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei subsequently wrote that the amended bill's "benefits likely outweigh its costs," a qualified endorsement that nonetheless represented the only major frontier-AI laboratory to break with the broader industry opposition.
On 28 August 2024 the California State Assembly passed the amended bill 48–16; on 29 August the Senate concurred 30–9, sending the bill to Newsom's desk. Sunny Gandhi's Assembly-passage statement — that "SB 1047 represents a critical step towards responsible development and proactive governance" and that "the bipartisan floor vote in both houses shows California lawmakers understand exactly what is at stake" — was carried in the Wiener office's press release alongside Nathan Calvin's framing that "we will be safer with SB 1047" and that "the vast majority of Californians support this bill."
The campaign's September 2024 mobilization combined three letter tracks targeted at the governor's signing decision. On 9 September 2024, SAG-AFTRA — represented by General Counsel Jeffrey Bennett, who framed SB 1047 as "the one bill that targets only the incredibly powerful expensive systems" — sent a letter to Newsom urging signature, the union's first formal engagement on broad AI safety beyond its entertainment-specific deepfake concerns. The same day, more than 113 current and former employees of OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, Meta, and xAI signed a public letter in support of the bill.
The most prominent veto-eve artefact came on 25 September 2024 with the Artists 4 Safe AI open letter, an Encode-coordinated push that gathered signatures from more than 125 Hollywood actors, directors, and producers urging Newsom to sign SB 1047. Lead signatories included Jane Fonda, Mark Ruffalo, Shonda Rhimes, J.J. Abrams, Pedro Pascal, Judd Apatow, Rob Reiner, Mark Hamill, Ava DuVernay, Mahershala Ali, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Don Cheadle, Jessica Chastain, Allison Janney, Fran Drescher, Sean Astin, Janelle Monáe, Mariska Hargitay, Alec Baldwin, Annaleigh Ashford, Alyssa Milano, Jessica Alba, Rosanna Arquette, John Cho, Jennifer Beals, and Tom Arnold. The letter's central framing — "this bill is not about protecting artists — it's about protecting everyone" — explicitly moved the entertainment industry's prior, sectoral AI advocacy into the broader frontier-AI safety frame Encode had been organising around. Stanford Daily reporting subsequently credited Encode Justice with coordinating the Hollywood track, noting Revanur's role in the organisational work behind the letter.
On 29 September 2024, Governor Newsom vetoed SB 1047. The veto message argued that the bill's size-only threshold "applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions" based on model size alone, without considering whether systems operated in high-risk environments — that the framework was "a solution that is not informed by an empirical trajectory analysis of AI systems and capabilities." Newsom paired the veto with an announcement that he would convene a working group on responsible AI development frameworks led by Stanford's Fei-Fei Li, Carnegie Endowment president Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, and UC Berkeley's Jennifer Tour Chayes.
Sneha Revanur's reaction statement, released the day of the veto, called the decision "painful and disappointing" and a signal that "the tech lobby's chokehold is far tighter than the people's," citing polling showing 77% of Californians supported the bill. Revanur framed the veto, on record, as "an opening salvo. Next time, our movement will win. In some ways, it already has — we've catapulted the conversation about AI policy into the spotlight."
Across eight months, the campaign settled into a recognisable repertoire: formal bill co-sponsorship and direct Sacramento legislative work by Encode's policy staff (Sunny Gandhi leading on political affairs, with Nathan Calvin on state legal strategy and Seve Christian on California operations); validator endorsements from the two most-cited AI researchers on the public record (Hinton and Bengio) anchoring the technical-credibility track; a coalition-letter cadence escalating from May Senate-floor statements through the August Anthropic qualified endorsement, the September 9 SAG-AFTRA and AI-lab-employee letters, and the 25 September Artists 4 Safe AI letter; and a press-and-op-ed track that ran through Encode's own channels and partner platforms, including a co-authored op-ed by Revanur and Grey's Anatomy actor Jason George making the public case for signature. The campaign's tactical posture — youth-led legitimacy paired with senior-researcher validators paired with Hollywood public-letter mobilization paired with Sacramento inside work — is the template that subsequent Encode-coordinated US state-AI-policy campaigns have been built on.
The Joint California Policy Working Group on AI Frontier Models — convened by Newsom in the weeks after the veto and led by Li, Cuéllar, and Chayes — released its final 53-page California Report on Frontier AI Policy on 17 June 2025. The report recommended third-party evaluation of frontier models, incident-reporting infrastructure, whistleblower protections, and risk disclosure to downstream developers — several of which had been load-bearing provisions of SB 1047. Wiener and Encode Justice carried those recommendations into a narrower successor bill, SB 53, the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act. Newsom signed SB 53 into law on 29 September 2025 — exactly one year after the SB 1047 veto — making it the first US statute focused squarely on frontier-AI safety, with a $500 million-revenue scoping threshold covering roughly five to eight large developers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, Microsoft), a 1 January 2026 effective date, and $1 million-per-violation civil penalties.
For the wider make-AI-good movement this corpus is mapping, the SB 1047 campaign matters on four connected counts. First, it is the first sustained US-state legislative campaign on the public record in which a youth-led civil-society organisation took formal bill co-sponsorship of a frontier-AI safety statute — moving Encode Justice from validator and amicus work into the inside game of state legislation. Second, the campaign assembled the broadest civil-society coalition any US-state frontier-AI safety bill had then put on the public record — combining youth advocacy with senior AI-researcher endorsements (Hinton, Bengio), AI-lab employee solidarity (the 113-plus signatories of the September letter), an entertainment-industry union (SAG-AFTRA), and a 125-plus Hollywood public-figure letter (Artists 4 Safe AI). Third, although Newsom's veto stopped the immediate signing, the bill's substantive provisions — third-party evaluation, incident reporting, whistleblower protection, risk disclosure — were carried forward into the post-veto Joint California Policy Working Group's final report and then into Wiener's SB 53, which Newsom signed on 29 September 2025, making the SB 1047 campaign legible in retrospect as a multi-year arc rather than a 2024 defeat. Fourth, the working template the campaign established — youth-led co-sponsorship plus Sacramento inside work plus validator endorsements plus a Hollywood public-letter track — has become a reference point for subsequent state-level AI-safety organising across the corpus, and is now part of the inheritance newer state-AI-policy campaigns explicitly cite.
04 · Sources
15 sources listed from the pinned corpus. Links are shown only when the source URL is a valid HTTP(S) address.
Wikipedia overview of SB 1047 — primary source for the 7 February 2024 introduction, the 21 May 2024 Senate vote (32–1), the 15 August 2024 amendments removing the Frontier Model Division and the perjury penalty, the 28 August 2024 Assembly vote (48–16) and 29 August 2024 Senate concurrence (30–9), the 29 September 2024 veto, the 9 September 2024 letter signed by 113 current and former AI-lab employees, and the named co-sponsors (Center for AI Safety Action Fund, Economic Security Action California, Encode Justice) alongside co-authors Senator Roth (D-Riverside), Senator Susan Rubio (D-Baldwin Park), and Senator Stern (D-Los Angeles)
Senator Scott Wiener's office press release on the 21 May 2024 Senate passage of SB 1047 (32–1) — primary source for Encode VP of Political Affairs Sunny Gandhi's quoted statement, for the bill's substantive scope (10^26 FLOPs / $100m training compute threshold, pre-deployment safety testing, red-teaming, cybersecurity, post-deployment monitoring, whistleblower protections, CalCompute public compute cluster, Attorney General enforcement authority), and for the named "Godfathers of AI" endorsements from Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio
Wiener's office press release on the 28 August 2024 Assembly passage — primary source for the bipartisan 49–15 vote, the three sponsor organizations (Center for AI Safety Action Fund, Economic Security Action California, Encode Justice), Sunny Gandhi's statement that "SB 1047 represents a critical step towards responsible development and proactive governance," and Nathan Calvin's CAIS Action Fund framing that "we will be safer with SB 1047" and that "the vast majority of Californians support this bill"
Stanford Daily coverage of the SB 1047 veto — primary source for Encode Justice's role coordinating Hollywood support including signatures from Mark Ruffalo and Shonda Rhimes, for Sneha Revanur's reaction framing post-veto progress as "to see how far we came, how many allies we activated in the process," for Fei-Fei Li's opposition concerns about academic research access, and for Russell Wald's alternative aviation-style incident-reporting framing
Deadline coverage of the Artists 4 Safe AI open letter to Newsom (25 September 2024) — primary source for the 125-Hollywood-figure signatory count, the lead-signatory list (Jane Fonda, Shonda Rhimes, Pedro Pascal, J.J. Abrams, Mark Ruffalo, Sheryl Lee Ralph, Jean Smart, Hannah Einbinder, Ava DuVernay, Rosie O'Donnell, Mark Hamill, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Jessica Chastain, Allison Janney, Judd Apatow, Fran Drescher, Sean Astin, Janelle Monáe, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Don Cheadle, Mariska Hargitay, Sophia Bush, Connie Britton, Alec Baldwin, Mahershala Ali, Annaleigh Ashford, Alyssa Milano, Jessica Alba, Rosanna Arquette, John Cho, Jennifer Beals, Tom Arnold), and the letter's "This bill is not about protecting artists — it's about protecting everyone" framing
Variety coverage of SAG-AFTRA's 9 September 2024 letter to Newsom in support of SB 1047 — primary source for the union's first formal engagement on broad AI safety beyond entertainment-specific concerns, for SAG-AFTRA General Counsel Jeffrey Bennett's framing of SB 1047 as targeting "incredibly powerful expensive systems," for the union's deepfake-rationale framing, and for confirmation that no other entertainment-industry union joined the veto-eve push
Newsweek coverage of the 29 September 2024 veto — primary source for Sneha Revanur's full post-veto statement ("painful and disappointing"; "sends a signal that the tech lobby's chokehold is far tighter than the people's"; "this is just an opening salvo. Next time, our movement will win"; "we've catapulted the conversation about AI policy into the spotlight"), for the 77% Californian-support polling number Revanur cited, and for Scott Wiener's "missed opportunity" framing of the veto
Governor Newsom's 29 September 2024 SB 1047 veto message — primary source for the governor's stated reasons (size-only threshold not informed by empirical trajectory analysis; the bill applying "stringent standards to even the most basic functions" based on model size rather than deployment context) and for the announcement of the working group to develop voluntary AI guardrails
Carnegie Endowment analysis of SB 1047 — primary source for the supporter-versus-opposer landscape (supporters: Anthropic, Hinton and Bengio, civil-society catastrophic-risk advocates; opponents: Google, Meta, OpenAI, tech industry associations, Fei-Fei Li, House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, Representative Zoe Lofgren) and for the bill's positioning at the centre of the 2024 frontier-AI regulation debate
CalMatters coverage of the 29 September 2024 veto — independent confirmation of the veto date and Newsom's reasoning, of the broad opposition coalition (Google, Meta, OpenAI, a16z, YC, Nancy Pelosi, Zoe Lofgren), and of the bill's progressive amendments through summer 2024
Joint California Policy Working Group on AI Frontier Models — primary source for the post-veto working group's composition (Fei-Fei Li of Stanford HAI, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar of the Carnegie Endowment, Jennifer Tour Chayes of UC Berkeley) and its mandate from Newsom following the SB 1047 veto
The 17 June 2025 California Report on Frontier AI Policy — primary source for the working group's final 53-page recommendations covering third-party evaluation, incident reporting, whistleblower protections, and risk disclosure to downstream developers, several of which were carried into SB 53
Governor Newsom's 29 September 2025 announcement signing SB 53, the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act — primary source for the SB 1047 successor bill's narrower transparency-and-incident-reporting framing, signed exactly one year after the SB 1047 veto
Wikipedia overview of SB 53 — primary source for the law's positioning as the United States' first statute focused squarely on frontier-AI safety, for the $500 million-revenue threshold scoping it to roughly five to eight large developers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, Microsoft), for the 1 January 2026 effective date, and for the $1 million per violation civil-penalty structure
Consistently Candid podcast episode
Source: entities/campaigns/camp-encode-justice-california-sb-1047-2024.md in movement-graph at pin 3cc1a36.