Skip to content
Make AI Good

Graph · Organisation

Tech Oversight Project

01 · In focus

One organisation, in the field.

The structured facts the source records about Tech Oversight Project, the count of declared adjacencies in the corpus, and the federation map zoomed on this node and its neighbours.

organisation

4 declared connections

Kind
Organisation
Status
active
Confidence
high
Location
Washington, DC
Founded
2022
Entity ID
org-tech-oversight-project
Network
View in network

Tags US, washington-dc, political-accountability, ai-super-pac-tracking, voter-education, dark-money-exposure, ai-preemption-opposition, 501c4, antitrust, watchdog, campaign-finance-reform

Tech Oversight Project · 4 direct neighbours visible

02 · Connections

4 adjacencies, by relation.

Split by direction. Direct links are the ones Tech Oversight Project’s source record names; inferred backlinks are records elsewhere in the corpus that point at this entity.

Direct from this record

3 links

Links named in this entity's structured fields.

Inferred backlinks

1 link

Other records that name this entity.

03 · Background

From the source record.

Body prose as it appears in movement-graph’s published markdown for this entity. Links to other corpus entities resolve to their graph page; links to deeper repo paths are kept as text so the page does not invent a route.

The Tech Oversight Project is a Washington, DC-based 501(c)(4) advocacy organization founded in January 2022 that describes itself as "the only tech watchdog dedicated solely to research, rapid response, and aggressive media tactics that shape the debate around tech policy in Washington, D.C., and statehouses across the country." Led by Executive Director Sacha Haworth — a veteran of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, House Majority PAC, and American Bridge 21st Century Foundation — it has become the primary US organization tracking and exposing the AI industry's political-money footprint, operating a standing research program on AI super PAC spending, public voter education tools, and coordinated multi-organizational coalition opposition to federal AI preemption legislation.

Founding and early focus

The Tech Oversight Project was launched in January 2022 with initial backing from the Omidyar Network — the philanthropic network of eBay founder Pierre Omidyar — and the advocacy arm of the Economic Security Project, led by Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes. The organization launched with an explicit campaign-style posture aimed at Big Tech antitrust accountability: its first major advocacy project supported the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, bipartisan legislation that would have required large technology platforms to refrain from preferentially ranking their own products in search results.

This origin in antitrust accountability — treating large technology companies as political actors whose regulatory environment requires active counter-pressure — established the organizational model that its subsequent AI-focused work would inherit and intensify.

AI political-money exposure

By 2025–2026, the AI industry's political spending had grown to a scale that made it the Tech Oversight Project's primary focus. In June 2026, the organization launched two complementary public-access tools: an AI Super PAC Research Book and a companion Ad Library that together track 17 industry-funded dark-money organizations aligned with the AI industry's political interests in the 2026 midterm election cycle. The Research Book draws exclusively on FEC, IRS, and publicly available disclosure filings and documents over $188 million raised and more than $74 million spent by entities backed by OpenAI, Palantir, Andreessen Horowitz, Anthropic, Meta, and Google across federal and state races. The Ad Library catalogs over 100 political advertisements and is designed to be navigable by journalists, researchers, and voters without specialist campaign-finance knowledge.

The central target is "AI preemption" — the industry-funded argument that a federal framework should supersede state-level AI consumer and worker protections. The Tech Oversight Project documented more than $100 million flowing through entities including Leading the Future (backed by a16z founders Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, which raised $15 million and transferred $10 million to subsidiary PACs Think Big and American Mission), and David Sacks's Innovation Council. Industry-backed PACs outspent movement organizations by roughly $5 million at the federal level and over $20 million unchallenged at the state level — a financial disparity the organization's research is designed to make visible to the public and to legislators' own constituents.

In June 2026, the Tech Oversight Project specifically fact-checked OpenAI's role in creating and funding Leading the Future, naming it as an AI super PAC whose advertising made specific claims the organization publicly challenged.

Coalition building and constituent accountability

The organization deploys its exposure research into active coalition and voter accountability campaigns. In April 2026, the Tech Oversight Project coordinated a coalition letter from 13 organizations spanning children's online safety, disability rights, AI safety, and tech watchdog groups, addressed to Democratic Members of Congress — Representatives Clarke, Gottheimer, Gomez, Liccardo, and Subramanyam — urging them to reject endorsements from Leading the Future and disavow its advertising support. The coalition's argument links the super PAC's preemption agenda directly to concrete harms: existing state laws that lower costs on families, protect children and teens online, and protect workers.

To ground the coalition's political argument in constituency data, the organization commissioned district-level polling in CA-23 and MA-3 — districts whose members are targeted by AI super PAC spending. The polling found that by a two-to-one margin, constituents in those districts oppose their representatives' support for AI preemption and believe states should retain the authority to pass their own AI consumer protection laws.

On the legislative side, the Tech Oversight Project supports the GUARD Act and state-level chatbot protection bills, anchoring its exposure and coalition work in specific policy demands rather than leaving the political-money research standing alone as accountability journalism. The voter education tools — Research Book and Ad Library — are the public-facing layer of this integrated approach, translating movement-side political intelligence about AI industry money flows into a form that voters in affected congressional districts can understand and act on.

04 · Sources

Where this came from.

9 sources listed from the pinned corpus. Links are shown only when the source URL is a valid HTTP(S) address.

  1. techoversight.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    Official about page — mission statement; self-description as the only tech watchdog dedicated solely to research, rapid response, and aggressive media tactics shaping tech policy in DC and statehouses.

  2. influencewatch.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    Founded January 2022; 501(c)(4); initial funders Omidyar Network and Economic Security Project advocacy arm; Executive Director Sacha Haworth background — DCCC, House Majority PAC, American Bridge 21st Century Foundation; initial focus on antitrust legislation.

  3. techoversight.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    Program areas — AI super PAC research; antitrust; youth online safety; data privacy; supports GUARD Act and state chatbot protection bills; opposes AI preemption; multistate coalition advocacy.

  4. techoversight.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    April 2026 — calls out Big Tech AI preemption campaign; Leading the Future raised $15M from a16z founders; $10M transferred to Think Big and American Mission subsidiaries; documents coordinated industry effort to preempt state AI laws.

  5. techoversight.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    April 2026 coalition letter — 13 organizations spanning children's online safety, disability rights, AI safety, and tech watchdog groups; addressed to Reps. Clarke, Gottheimer, Gomez, Liccardo, and Subramanyam urging rejection of Leading the Future endorsements.

  6. techoversight.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    Constituent polling in CA-23 and MA-3 — by 2-to-1 margin, constituents oppose their representatives' support for AI preemption; released to create electoral accountability pressure.

  7. techoversight.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    June 2026 — launched AI Super PAC Research Book and Ad Library; 17 industry-funded organizations tracked; $188M+ raised and $74M+ spent across 2026 midterm cycle; 100+ political ads cataloged; audience is journalists, researchers, and voters.

  8. techoversight.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    AI Super PAC Research Book — tracks OpenAI, Palantir, Andreessen Horowitz, Meta, Google, and Anthropic-connected super PACs; FEC, IRS, and publicly available sources; data current through August 21, 2026.

  9. techoversight.org

    Checked 2026-09-02

    June 2026 — fact-checks OpenAI's role in creating and funding Leading the Future; challenges specific advertising claims made by the super PAC during the 2026 midterm cycle.

Source: entities/organizations/org-tech-oversight-project.md — movement-graph pin 5edfc3b.